The Developmental Switch in Bacteriophage λ: A Critical Role of the Cro Protein.

Bacteriophage λ of Escherichia coli has two alternative life cycles after infection-host survival with lysogen formation, or host lysis and phage production. In a lysogen, CI represses the two lytic promoters, pR and pL, and activates its own transcription from the auto-regulated pRM promoter. During induction from the lysogenic to lytic state, CI is inactivated, and the two lytic promoters are de-repressed allowing for expression of Cro from pR. Cro is known to repress transcription of CI from pRM to prevent lysogeny. We show here that when Cro and CI are both present but at low levels, the low level of Cro initially stimulates the lytic promoters while CI repressor is still present, stimulating the level of Cro to a concentration required for pRM repression. Cro has no stimulatory effect without the presence of CI. We propose that this early auto-activating role of Cro at lower concentrations is essential in the developmental switch to lytic growth, whereas pRM repression by Cro at relatively higher concentrations avoids restoring lysogeny.

Genome-Wide Transcriptional Regulation and Chromosome Structural Arrangement by GalR in E. coli.

The regulatory protein, GalR, is known for controlling transcription of genes related to D-galactose metabolism in Escherichia coli. Here, using a combination of experimental and bioinformatic approaches, we identify novel GalR binding sites upstream of several genes whose function is not directly related to D-galactose metabolism. Moreover, we do not observe regulation of these genes by GalR under standard growth conditions. Thus, our data indicate a broader regulatory role for GalR, and suggest that regulation by GalR is modulated by other factors. Surprisingly, we detect regulation of 158 transcripts by GalR, with few regulated genes being associated with a nearby GalR binding site. Based on our earlier observation of long-range interactions between distally bound GalR dimers, we propose that GalR indirectly regulates the transcription of many genes by inducing large-scale restructuring of the chromosome.

New Insights into the Phage Genetic Switch: Effects of Bacteriophage Lambda Operator Mutations on DNA Looping and Regulation of PR, PL, and PRM.

One of the best understood systems in genetic regulatory biology is the so-called "genetic switch" that determines the choice the phage-encoded CI repressor binds cooperatively to tripartite operators, OL and OR, in a defined pattern, thus blocking the transcription at two lytic promoters, PL and PR, and auto-regulating the promoter, PRM, which directs CI synthesis by the prophage. Fine-tuning of the maintenance of lysogeny is facilitated by interactions between CI dimers bound to OR and OL through the formation of a loop by the intervening DNA segment. By using a purified in vitro transcription system, we have genetically dissected the roles of individual operator sites in the formation of the DNA loop and thus have gained several new and unexpected insights into the system. First, although both OR and OL are tripartite, the presence of only a single active CI binding site in one of the two operators is sufficient for DNA loop formation. Second, in PL, unlike in PR, the promoter distal operator site, OL3, is sufficient to directly repress PL. Third, DNA looping mediated by the formation of CI octamers arising through the interaction of pairs of dimers bound to adjacent operator sites in OR and OL does not require OR and OL to be aligned "in register", that is, CI bound to "out-of-register" sub-operators, for example, OL1~Ol2 and OR2~OR3, can also mediate loop formation. Finally, based on an examination of the mechanism of activation of PRM when only OR1 or OR2 are wild type, we hypothesize that RNA polymerase bound at PR interferes with DNA loop formation. Thus, the formation of DNA loops involves potential interactions between proteins bound at numerous cis-acting sites, which therefore very subtly contribute to the regulation of the "switch".

Molecular Mechanisms of Transcription Initiation at gal Promoters and their Multi-Level Regulation by GalR, CRP and DNA Loop.

Studying the regulation of transcription of the gal operon that encodes the amphibolic pathway of d-galactose metabolism in Escherichia coli discerned a plethora of principles that operate in prokaryotic gene regulatory processes. In this chapter, we have reviewed some of the more recent findings in gal that continues to reveal unexpected but important mechanistic details. Since the operon is transcribed from two overlapping promoters, P1 and P2, regulated by common regulatory factors, each genetic or biochemical experiment allowed simultaneous discernment of two promoters. Recent studies range from genetic, biochemical through biophysical experiments providing explanations at physiological, mechanistic and single molecule levels. The salient observations highlighted here are: the axiom of determining transcription start points, discovery of a new promoter element different from the known ones that influences promoter strength, occurrence of an intrinsic DNA sequence element that overrides the transcription elongation pause created by a DNA-bound protein roadblock, first observation of a DNA loop and determination its trajectory, and piggybacking proteins and delivering to their DNA target.

Differential role of base pairs on gal promoters strength.

Sequence alignments of promoters in prokaryotes postulated that the frequency of occurrence of a base pair at a given position of promoter elements reflects its contribution to intrinsic promoter strength. We directly assessed the contribution of the four base pairs in each position in the intrinsic promoter strength by keeping the context constant in Escherichia coli cAMP-CRP (cAMP receptor protein) regulated gal promoters by in vitro transcription assays. First, we show that base pair frequency within known consensus elements correlates well with promoter strength. Second, we observe some substitutions upstream of the ex-10 TG motif that are important for promoter function. Although the galP1 and P2 promoters overlap, only three positions where substitutions inactivated both promoters were found. We propose that RNA polymerase binds to the -12T base pair as part of double-stranded DNA while opening base pairs from -11A to +3 to form the single-stranded transcription bubble DNA during isomerization. The cAMP-CRP complex rescued some deleterious substitutions in the promoter region. The base pair roles and their flexibilities reported here for E. coli gal promoters may help construction of synthetic promoters in gene circuitry experiments in which overlapping promoters with differential controls may be warranted.

Specific contacts of the -35 region of the galP1 promoter by RNA polymerase inhibit GalR-mediated DNA looping repression.

The P1 promoter of the galactose operon in Escherichia coli is one of the best studied examples of 'extended -10' promoters. Recognition of the P1 promoter does not require specific contacts between RNA polymerase and its poor -35 element. To investigate whether specific recognition of the -35 element would affect the regulation of P1 by GalR, we mutagenized the -35 element of P1, isolated variants of the -35 element and studied the regulation of the mutant promoters by in vitro transcription assays and by mathematical modeling. The results show that the GalR-mediated DNA loop is less efficient in repressing P1 transcription when RNA polymerase binds to the -10 and -35 elements concomitantly. Our results suggest that promoters that lack specific -35 element recognition allow decoupling of local chromosome structure from transcription initiation.

A genetic network that balances two outcomes utilizes asymmetric recognition of operator sites.

Stability and induction of the lysogenic state of bacteriophage λ are balanced by a complex regulatory network. A key feature of this network is the mutually exclusive cooperative binding of a repressor dimer (CI) to one of two pairs of binding sites, O(R)1-O(R)2 or O(R)2-O(R)3. The structural features that underpin the mutually exclusive binding mode are not well understood. Recent studies have demonstrated that CI is an asymmetric dimer. The functional importance of the asymmetry is not fully clear. Due to the asymmetric nature of the CI dimer as well as its binding sites, there are two possible bound orientations. By fluorescence resonance energy transfer measurements we showed that CI prefers one bound orientation. We also demonstrated that the relative configuration of the binding sites is important for CI dimer-dimer interactions and consequent cooperative binding. We proposed that the operator configuration dictates the orientations of the bound CI molecules, which in turn dictates CI cooperative interaction between the O(R)1-O(R)2 or O(R)2-O(R)3, but not both. Modeling suggests that the relative orientation of the C- and N-terminal domains may play an important role in the mutually exclusive nature of the cooperative binding. This work correlates unique structural features of a transcription regulatory protein with the functional properties of a gene regulatory network.

AFM studies of lambda repressor oligomers securing DNA loops.

Large, cooperative assemblies of proteins that wrap and/or loop genomic DNA may "epigenetically" shift configurational equilibria that determine developmental pathways. Such is the case of the lambda bacteriophage which may exhibit virulent (lytic) or quiescent (lysogenic) growth. The lysogenic state of lambda prophages is maintained by the lambda repressor (CI), which binds to tripartite operator sites in each of the O(L) and O(R) control regions located about 2.3 kbp apart on the phage genome and represses lytic promoters. Dodd and collaborators have suggested that an initial loop formed by interaction between CI bound at O(R) and O(L) provides the proper scaffold for additional CI binding to attenuate the P(RM) promoter and avoid over production of CI. Recently, the looping equilibrium as a function of CI concentration was measured using tethered particle motion analysis, but the oligomerization of CI in looped states could not be determined. Scanning force microscopy has now been used to probe these details directly. An equilibrium distribution of looped and unlooped molecules confined to a plane was found to be commensurate to that for tethered molecules in solution, and the occupancies of specific operator sites for several looped and unlooped conformations were determined. Some loops appeared to be sealed by oligomers of 6-8, most by oligomers of 10-12, and a few by oligomers of 14-16.

Direct demonstration and quantification of long-range DNA looping by the lambda bacteriophage repressor.

Recently, it was proposed that DNA looping by the lambda repressor (CI protein) strengthens repression of lytic genes during lysogeny and simultaneously ensures efficient switching to lysis. To investigate this hypothesis, tethered particle motion experiments were performed and dynamic CI-mediated looping of single DNA molecules containing the lambda repressor binding sites separated by 2317 bp (the wild-type distance) was quantitatively analyzed. DNA containing all three intact operators or with mutated o3 operators were compared. Modeling the thermodynamic data established the free energy of CI octamer-mediated loop formation as 1.7 kcal/mol, which decreased to -0.7 kcal/mol when supplemented by a tetramer (octamer+tetramer-mediated loop). These results support the idea that loops secured by an octamer of CI bound at oL1, oL2, oR1 and oR2 operators must be augmented by a tetramer of CI bound at the oL3 and oR3 to be spontaneous and stable. Thus the o3 sites are critical for loops secured by the CI protein that attenuate cI expression.

Induction of the galactose enzymes in Escherichia coli is independent of the C-1-hydroxyl optical configuration of the inducer D-galactose.

The two optical forms of aldohexose galactose differing at the C-1 position, alpha-D-galactose and beta-D-galactose, are widespread in nature. The two anomers also occur in di- and polysaccharides, as well as in glycoconjugates. The anomeric form of D-galactose, when present in complex carbohydrates, e.g., cell wall, glycoproteins, and glycolipids, is specific. Their interconversion occurs as monomers and is effected by the enzyme mutarotase (aldose-1-epimerase). Mutarotase and other D-galactose-metabolizing enzymes are coded by genes that constitute an operon in Escherichia coli. The operon is repressed by the repressor GalR and induced by D-galactose. Since, depending on the carbon source during growth, the cell can make only one of the two anomers of D-galactose, the cell must also convert one anomer to the other for use in specific biosynthetic pathways. Thus, it is imperative that induction of the gal operon, specifically the mutarotase, be achievable by either anomer of D-galactose. Here we report in vivo and in vitro experiments showing that both alpha-D-galactose and beta-D-galactose are capable of inducing transcription of the gal operon with equal efficiency and kinetics. Whereas all substitutions at the C-1 position in the alpha configuration inactivate the induction capacity of the sugar, the effect of substitutions in the beta configuration varies depending upon the nature of the substitution; methyl and phenyl derivatives induce weakly, but the glucosyl derivative does not.

DNA sequences in gal operon override transcription elongation blocks.

The DNA loop that represses transcription from galactose (gal) promoters is infrequently formed in stationary-phase cells because the concentration of the loop architectural protein HU is significantly low at that state, resulting in expression of the operon in the absence of the gal inducer D-galactose. Unexpectedly, transcription from the gal promoters under these conditions overrides physical block because of the presence of the Gal repressor bound to an internal operator (O(I)) located downstream of the promoters. We have shown here that although a stretch of pyrimidine residues (UUCU) in the RNA:DNA hybrid located immediately upstream of O(I) weakens the RNA:DNA hybrid and favors RNA polymerase (RNAP) pausing and backtracking, a stretch of purines (GAGAG) in the RNA present immediately upstream of the pause sequence in the hybrid acts as an antipause element by stabilizing the RNA:DNA duplex and preventing backtracking. This facilitates forward translocation of RNAP, including overriding of the DNA-bound Gal repressor barrier at O(I). When the GAGAG sequence is separated from the pyrimidine sequence by a 5-bp DNA insertion, RNAP backtracking is favored from a weak hybrid to a more stable hybrid. RNAP backtracking is sensitive to Gre factors, D-galactose, and antisense oligonucleotides. The ability of a native DNA sequence to override transcription elongation blocks in the gal operon uncovers a previously unknown way of regulating gal metabolism in Escherichia coli. It also explains the synthesis of gal enzymes in the absence of inducer for biosynthetic reactions.

The antiparallel loops in gal DNA.

Interactions between proteins bound to distant sites along a DNA molecule require bending and twisting deformations in the intervening DNA. In certain systems, the sterically allowed protein-DNA and protein-protein interactions are hypothesized to produce loops with distinct geometries that may also be thermodynamically and biologically distinct. For example, theoretical models of Gal repressor/HU-mediated DNA-looping suggest that the antiparallel DNA loops, A1 and A2, are thermodynamically quite different. They are also biologically different, since in experiments using DNA molecules engineered to form only one of the two loops, the A2 loop failed to repress in vitro transcription. Surprisingly, single molecule measurements show that both loop trajectories form and that they appear to be quite similar energetically and kinetically.

Axiom of determining transcription start points by RNA polymerase in Escherichia coli.

To investigate the determining factors in the selection of the transcription start points (tsp) by RNA polymerase of Escherichia coli, we systematically deleted or substituted single base pairs (bps) at 25 putative critical positions in the two extended -10 promoters, P1 and P2, of the gal operon. These changes extend downstream from -24 to +1 of the P1 promoter. In vitro transcription assays using supercoiled DNA templates revealed a preference for a purine in the non-template strand for tsp in both promoters. The optimal tsp is the 11th bp counting downstream from the -10 position. A single bp deletion anywhere from -10 to +1 switched the tsp to the next available purine 2-3 bp downstream on the non-template strand whereas deleting a single bp at position from -24 to -11 did not affect the tsp. The nature of the 10 bp sequence of the -10 to -1 region, while affecting promoter strength, did not influence tsp. The cAMP-CRP complex, which stimulates P1 and represses P2, did not affect the tsp selection process. The rules of tsp selection by RNA polymerase containing sigma70 in gal and pyr promoters discussed here may be applicable to others.

Supercoiling and denaturation in Gal repressor/heat unstable nucleoid protein (HU)-mediated DNA looping.

The overall topology of DNA profoundly influences the regulation of transcription and is determined by DNA flexibility as well as the binding of proteins that induce DNA torsion, distortion, and/or looping. Gal repressor (GalR) is thought to repress transcription from the two promoters of the gal operon of Escherichia coli by forming a DNA loop of approximately 40 nm of DNA that encompasses the promoters. Associated evidence of a topological regulatory mechanism of the transcription repression is the requirement for a supercoiled DNA template and the histone-like heat unstable nucleoid protein (HU). By using single-molecule manipulations to generate and finely tune tension in DNA molecules, we directly detected GalR/HU-mediated DNA looping and characterized its kinetics, thermodynamics, and supercoiling dependence. The factors required for gal DNA looping in single-molecule experiments (HU, GalR and DNA supercoiling) correspond exactly to those necessary for gal repression observed both in vitro and in vivo. Our single-molecule experiments revealed that negatively supercoiled DNA, under slight tension, denatured to facilitate GalR/HU-mediated DNA loop formation. Such topological intermediates may operate similarly in other multiprotein complexes of transcription, replication, and recombination.

Effect of varying the supercoiling of DNA on transcription and its regulation.

The effect of superhelicity of DNA templates on transcription is well documented in several cases. However, the amount of supercoiling that is needed to bring about any changes and the steps at which such effects are exerted were not systematically studied. We investigated the effect of DNA supercoiling on transcription from a set of promoters present on a plasmid by using a series of topoisomers with different superhelical densities ranging from totally relaxed to more than physiological. In vitro transcription assays with these topoisomers in the absence and presence of gene regulatory proteins showed that the effect of negative supercoiling on intrinsic transcription varies from promoter to promoter. Some of those promoters, in which DNA superhelicity stimulated transcription, displayed specific optima of superhelical density while others did not. The results also showed that the amounts of abortive RNA synthesis from two of the promoters decreased and full-length RNA increased with increasing supercoiling, indicating for the first time an inverse relationship between full-length and abortive RNA synthesis and supporting a role of DNA superhelicity in promoter clearance. DNA supercoiling might also influence the point of RNA chain termination. Furthermore, the effect of varying the amount of supercoiling on the action of gene regulatory proteins suggested the mode of action, which is consistent with previous results. Our results underscore the importance of DNA supercoiling in fine-tuning promoter activities, which should be relevant in cell physiology given that local changes in chromosomal supercoiling must occur in different environments.

Operator-bound GalR dimers close DNA loops by direct interaction: tetramerization and inducer binding.

The assembly of the Gal repressosome, a higher order nucleoprotein complex that represses transcription of the gal operon in Escherichia coli, involves the formation of a DNA loop encompassing the promoter segment. GalR dimers bound to two spatially separated operators, O(E) and O(I), specifically interact with the histone-like protein HU and close the loop in supercoiled DNA. We isolated and characterized a GalR mutant containing an amino acid substitution (R282L) that can repress transcription in the absence of HU and supercoiled DNA both in vivo and in vitro. Repression involves the same DNA looping; deletion of either O(E) or O(I) makes the mutant GalR ineffective in repression. This and other results suggest that the R282L substitution increases the normal affinity between two DNA-bound GalR dimers, allowing looping. We conclude that GalR dimers interact directly and do not use HU as an adaptor in loop closure; HU and DNA supercoiling act in concert to stabilize the GalR tetramer. The stronger GalR-GalR interaction also made the gal transcription non-inducible, suggesting that the inducer binding acts by modulating tetramerization.

In vitro repression of the gal promoters by GalR and HU depends on the proper helical phasing of the two operators.

Repression of transcription initiation from the two gal promoters, P1 and P2, requires binding of GalR protein to two flanking operators, O(E) and O(I), binding of HU to a site, hbs, located between the two operators, and supercoiled DNA template. Previous experiments suggested that repression involves the interaction of two DNA-bound GalR proteins, which generates a 113-bp DNA loop encompassing the promoter region. Interaction between two DNA-bound proteins would be allowed if the binding sites on DNA are properly aligned. To test the idea that the observed repression of gal transcription in vitro is mediated by DNA looping, we investigated the effect of changing the relative angular orientation of O(E) and O(I) in the DNA helix. We found that repression is a periodic function of the distance between the two operator sites. Since repression recurred commensurate with DNA helical repeat, we conclude that the observed in vitro repression is mediated by DNA looping and the in vitro conditions reflect the in vivo situation.